What is Good Content? A Working Definition and Some General Principles

good contentFollowing the recent announcement revealing my subscriber count, several readers emailed me asking variations of the same question: What is good content? How do you produce the sort of content that will help your blog to build a readership?

This is quite an interesting question because many blogging experts have talked about the importance of great content and how it trumps other factors when it comes to growing one’s website.

I’m pretty sure you’ve all heard the adage ‘Content is King’ repeated so very often.

Good content is a necessary foundation for most successful blogs. High quality content makes it easier for someone to recommend it to friends or other potential readers. Content makes blog marketing a whole lot easier because it naturally supports the push or pull process involved in promoting a website.

Every successful blogger recommends the same thing: Create great content and learn how to market it. The whole crux of the matter lies with the notion of good content: What exactly is it? And if it’s so important, how do you create ‘good content’?

Let’s examine this idea of content quality in this article. For all its lauded benefits, I’ve not yet seen a working definition for it. Can we crack the content code and determine some general rules or guidelines for its development?

After some thought, I’ve made a list of three general principles on content quality, alongside a definition of what I consider to be good content.

Principle #1: Content Quality is Subjective

guidelines for content

I’ve talked about content development in a previous article but I’ll say this again: Content quality is subjective because it is inevitably tied to the knowledge or experience of both the content creator and reader.

When someone feels that an article is excellent, it is not so much because of the content quality itself but rather, his/her own knowledge levels and receptivity to ideas. For someone more experienced, the same article might seem amateurish.

This subjectivity of content consumption is one of the main reasons why I think that content dissemination and distribution channels are sometimes more important than the actual content quality. The more visitors you can get to view your articles, the more they will begin to resonate with the right people and spread on their own.

Recognize that there are many uncontrollable variable factors at play here. Every person that reads your blog has his/her own built-in filters. Some are looking for a very specific solution while others want general overviews for beginners. Their overall receptivity is also influenced by what they already know about the topic.

Don’t feel bad when nobody comments on or links to an article you thought was quite excellent. Nor should you be disappointed when others criticize your content because their opinions only offer a selective assessment on the value of your work.

Principle #2: Content Quality is Comparatively Determined

content quality mushrooms

Apart from content relativity, the value of an article is also comparatively determined. Your article will inevitably be juxtaposed with others on the same topic. The strength of another article will make yours less attractive as a citation source, unless you offer something distinctly different and unique.

Similarly, the weakness of other articles will make your content a more attractive and valuable resource. There is also a contextual determinism when it comes to advice given by experts. The strategies they recommend are often hypothetical or observations based on specific blogs in specific niches/situations.

These techniques and advice can sometimes be unsuitable for your blog niche, unless you learn how to implement them in a way which takes into account your audience expectations and the flow of information within your industry.

For some niches like entertainment/celebrity gossip, there is far more benefit in providing news reportage through short blog posts, than there is writing baits to attract social media audiences. This is because social media traffic is quite easily dwarfed by the massive number of search engine visitors.

Principle #3: There Are Guidelines to Determine Content Quality

Even though content quality is subjective and comparatively determined, one can still create content that is perceived to be of high quality. One way to do so is to study the popular articles of other bloggers, especially the ones in the same niche. These articles provide one with a rough measure of possible content popularity.

In my opinion, good content usually has the following characteristics:

  1. Thought-provoking. The article should present new ideas or offer a critical and new look at ideas or assumptions commonly held by others.

  2. Highly entertaining. An entertaining piece of content can come not only in the form of written text but videos or pictures. Humor is especially powerful when applied on current events or industry happenings.

  3. Important News. Breaking news are considered important because changes usually impact most people in the same industry or niche. Be the first to cover and explain news and people will naturally talk about your blog.

  4. Comprehensive. If your article is comprehensive enough, it may outshine others on the same topic. Bloggers love referencing articles which are comprehensive because it gives their readers a good starting point.

  5. Well Researched. Well researched articles with multiple links to related discussion on this topic are especially valuable because it allows you to insert yourself within an ongoing conversation in the blogosphere. Extensive research also denotes value because this signifies an investment of time.

  6. Unique. The less you repeat what other bloggers say, the more you’ll stand out. If your article examines a topic that’s rarely breached, it is likely that you’ll be regarded as an authority within the field as more people write about it.


Creating a Goal-Oriented Definition of ‘Good Content’

defining good content

Content is consumed by users in many ways and it is difficult to measure how they value your articles, apart from the usual citation links, comments or emails. Instead of defining ‘good content’ according to reader feedback, why not define it according to the content creator’s perspective?

When we talk about ‘good content’ consider how it impacts your blog and brand. Here’s a working definition: Good content refers to content which succeeds in achieving the objectives that the content creator has set for it.

For example, if you want to network with others in the same niche, a good piece of content should link out and reference as many bloggers as possible. If you are a linkbaiter purely looking to get some incoming links for a webpage, good content would be content which achieves that purpose of acquiring links.

Successful content is no longer measured by the opinions of yourself or your audience but rather, to what extend did it fulfill end goals.

Content determined by purpose is strategic. It serves an objective and strives to achieve a specific result. Before you write a blog post, you should clearly examine your intentions. What exactly do you want to achieve with this specific article? Each blog post must have a defined purpose. Frame the content to suit that specific goal.

And then after the post is published, promote it in a way which accentuates that goal. For instance, if you’re purely looking for opinions, send it to some friends via StumbleUpon or email and get them to let you know what they think about it.

If you’re out for some heavy social media traffic, push it out to some influencers and request they disseminate it to the appropriate channel. After the marketing process is finished, look at your post and record its results. How many links did you get? How many people commented on it? Did you manage to get it cited by a popular blogger?

These results will give you a rough indication of ‘good content’, i.e. content with a track record of achieving objectives. This goal orientated approach to content development may sound a little mechanical but I think its a fairly straightforward method to assess the quality of your work.

In the next article, I’ll talk more explicitly on different types of content goals and the type of content you should create to achieve them. Stay tuned!

For more content development strategies, subscribe to Dosh Dosh today.

52 Comments - Share Your Thoughts
  • I particularly enjoyed the explanation in principle 3. Some of that can be pretty challenging, such as being the one to break news in your niche… not to mention being the one to get credit for it if bigger names catch the story as well.

  • I think very few bloggers set quantifiable goals for each post they write. Thanks for this useful insight on content creation.

  • Great post… Sometimes though, i feel readers are not in the “mood” for quality content. They’re looking for quick fixes, tools to solve a problem or maybe just entertainment.
    I feel that a good post can sometimes be short, to the point and off topic and still be much appreciated by your followers.
    I certainly agree that to retain your reader base, quality content is the only way to go.

  • Great post, definitely gives web publishers/bloggers something to think about when sitting down to write a post.

    I mean I’ve had a post I put up just for fun get 40,000 unique visitors from Stumbleupon, while more in depth posts just get a few views however does great targeted SEO for me :)

    Most of my posts are #2 Highly entertaining.

    I’m always working harder to get out unique content…

  • Hey, this is good content:)

    Seriously, great post. The six characteristics of content quality is very insightful. To sum it all up, being intentional about your content ads value to your site.

  • In addition, I would say that your content should be TIMELY and yet TIMELESS.

    Your articles should be comprehensive and can easily be related to current issues and situations but at the same time, it will still remain relevant even if it’s read a few months or even years from the original date of posting.

  • To the guidelines to determine good content, I would add “well written”. At least I always respect a good writer whose texts are well-formed with unique use of language and so on.

  • great post.

  • Would love to get some insight from people over what they would rather see, our photos or words? Our website is very image heavy and therefore I generally keep it short on my writing.

    Everyone, feel free to contact me over this on our website form.

  • So very true.

    The problem I have is that I do come up with good ideas (I think), but I have terrible grammar which makes a potentially great article read like it was written by a toddler.

  • It takes me forever to write something. I guess that’s the beauty of the internet. Once I’m happy with it and hit the “Publish” button. Their it is for the rest of the world to see.

    Maki, I can see you edit these, so I’ll leave you a little msg. here. I need some help. I just don’t quite know what to do with this web site or the the blogs. How to get it all to tie together. I’m gonna go over to your team marketing forum and post in the joint ventures.

    Love your stuff
    Joe

  • Hello, great post you have here. I’ve been actively reading more blogs lately as mine is progressing and yours is one I seem to frequent. I need to improve my content a lot but its a working progress, these tips should help me along the way.

    Thanks, Scott.

  • this has great information in setting new perspective and tips to bloggers and writers

  • Hi, and thanks for a good post. I think that now I will think better before writing a post…

    P.S. I use to visit your blog sometimes even daily! Thanks

  • Good content is always going to be subjective – that said I subjectively love the Super Mario Mushroom Image in this post – do you know where I can buy some :p

  • I completely agree to the fact that contents value is mainly dependent on the knowledge level of the reader.
    For some it may be lame but for some it can be the best resource they found for the topic.

    Push the publish button anyways ;)

  • Thank you for the post on good content–my hunch is that this post achieved the objectives you set for it…thereby making it good content!

  • I really enjoy reading your posts! I agree on you both principles. I think that “good content” is quite subjective just as you demonstrate. Every blog has it’s own readers which could be experts or newbies on a particular niche. This demonstrate that an article could be good content for the newbies, but not for the expert. I think it’s important for a blog to probe that kind of information in order to be the most targeted as possible.

  • Maki,

    What did you mean by “assuage” in the second last sentence: “…I think its a fairly straightforward method to assuage the quality of your work”?

    Assuage means:
    To make milder or less severe; relieve; ease; mitigate

    Why would anyone want to mitigate quality? Were you thinking of a word other than “assuage”?

  • Maki on February 13th, 2008

    @Stephanie

    Breaking news is pretty difficult, unless you have the discipline to build up insider connections and monitor news outlets.

    @ Rajeev , Scott, Mands

    You’re welcome!

    @ Pierre

    Yeah, I’m sure some readers just want a short or off-topic post at times but I do think its useful to create content until the direction of a goal. It makes it easier to measure growth IMO.

    @ Lipton

    And that’s why we all love StumbleUpon…. :)

    @ Fitz

    Good points about being timely and timeless. Can be a little difficult but yes, it can be done.

    @ Bitten

    Definitely… good writing skills is always as asset for any content producer.

    @ Robert

    The more you write, the more you improve… at least that’s how I feel. :)

    @ Joe

    Sure… email me or anything if you need any advice with your site.

    @ Mr Happy

    Haha. I thought the Mario mushrooms were cute too… I think there are some plush toys or plastic figurines online…

    @ Beautiful Scraps

    Yes.. push that publish button anyway. No need to censor yourself!

    @RnBram

    Oops.. that was a mistake. I meant to say ‘assess’ instead of ‘assauge’ … I just changed it. Thanks for letting me know!

    @ Everyone else

    Thanks for all your comments!

  • I absolutely agree with you, Monetizing proses is Content->Traffic->Presell->Monetize. We’ll fail monetizing our blog if we are haven’t traffic, and traffic come from good content. :)

  • I think my answer would have been much simpler. If asked “what is good content?” I would just say:

    doshdosh.com

    Great post Maki! I don’t think I have ever seen this question addressed so well. Definitely one to bookmark.

  • In my opinion, good content is anything that helps the reader. Great content, on the other hand, packs a bunch of useful information in just a single article instead of breaking it up into smaller ones…

  • Thanks for the tips, I also do agree that content is relative (you used the term comparative). It’s good to maintain a competitive edge by scouring other blogs and seeing the content they post.

  • Great post! “Good content” HAS to give your web-visitor something that they could really sink their teeth into.

    I’ve bumped into way too many ME-too sites and blogs that don’t warrant a 2nd visit from me.

    But for those sites that have meaty-substance and spicy flair often find me visiting them time after time.

    In fact, I absolutely crave good content these days…and those sites that give me great depth and breadth reel me in and make me want to come back for seconds…and thirds…and fourths…

    Thanks for sharing your insight!

  • Points 3 – 6 (Important, Comprehensive, Well Researched and Unique) are very useful in defining good content. The idea is to “fill in the gaps” – define what is missing and filling it; or taking what already exists and going deeper with it.

    The process to this is constantly asking questions. It is more useful to ask the “right questions” than it is to have the “right answer”. Good questions should lead to good answers eliciting even more good questions.

    There is more to be found in “the process” than resides in the result itself.

Links to this Article
© 2007 - 2010 | Dosh Dosh | Content Copyright | Comment Policy | Privacy Policy