Mini Sites Vs. Flagship Websites: Business Models for Your Online Empire

shana-mini-sites.jpgA strategy when it comes to earning money online is to build multiple mini-sites which generate a consistent amount of income. For example, you can build multiple mini blogs around niche topics and then turn a profit through their collective revenue.

If each blog makes you $1 a day, 100 blogs will theoretically allow you to earn $100 every day. To increase your overall income, you’ll just have to increase the number of mini-sites you own.

An ingenious way to make a decent amount of money online? Perhaps.

While it does help you to earn some money, I prefer to adopting a flagship strategy that involves building brands and very large websites. This article examines some problems I’ve found with the mini-site approach and explain why I prefer it’s alternative.

Benefits of Having a Mini-Site Empire

Mini-sites do have some benefits and these are some of the few that I’ve observed while experimenting with multiple niche websites:

  • Easy to Make Money. Usually mini-sites don’t need to be popular with a large audience in other to make money. A consistent flow of search engine traffic is usually all that is needed and any deficit in ad revenue is overcome by the sheer volume of mini-websites you own.

  • Freshness. Having multiple websites can be refreshing as you can get tired of dealing with a specific topic, industry or site model. When you are tired of working on one project, just invest your time on another mini-site.

  • Personal Knowledge. Having a lot of mini-sites allows you to build experience in making money online. Managing and promoting a mini-site usually requires some research on the niche or monetization methods available and this adds to your overall understanding of what business models are profitable.

  • Diversified Income. If one site fails you’ll still have another money maker. All your eggs aren’t kept in one basket and the source of income can be more consistent once each of the mini-sites are moderately established.


Why I Prefer Not to Build Mini-Sites

While having a large portfolio of websites can help you make money, I’ve found that this brute force approach of creating multiple sites to increase collective income does not work well for me. Here are some reasons why:

  • Consumes a lot of resources. Mini-websites can be rather time consuming. You can hire a writer and manager for each of these sites but that means initial expenses on your part.

    Multiply that by a dozen websites and your expenses will start to pile up. Apart from content outsourcing, mini-sites will also require your attention when it comes to marketing, admin work and design/search optimization.


  • Poor Monetization Potential. Mini websites usually will not develop a large audience size. They might get some search traffic but if left alone or poorly managed, they won’t be able to compete with the stronger sites in their niche. This just means that your ability to sell direct advertising is greatly diminished, among other factors.

  • Mini-Sites will be Neglected. I’m sure many of you have started a side project or blog before and neglected it because you didn’t have the time to take care of it or because you’ve found that it just can’t compete with other established websites. It can be discouraging when your site doesn’t take off and become a success.

  • Income Generated is Uneven. I currently have a bunch of websites and each of them make a different amount of money. Building more websites doesn’t necessarily mean an increase in income. Building traffic to your website is fairly important for growth and monetization and I’ve found that its nearly impossible to focus on getting traffic to dozens of websites on a daily basis.


Building Flagship Websites Makes More Sense

I’ve recently developed several niche blogs, which have become a nice addition to my collection of online properties. These small websites do make me money but I’ve decided to focus on building much bigger websites instead.

Going niche in my previous approach has taught me a lot about some specific topics and has allowed me to understand the inherent growth ceiling for smaller niches.

Most of these small sites simply do not capture enough traffic for them to be highly profitable and I’ve grown tired of capturing only a small demographic which doesn’t allow the site to be as profitable as I want.

I want instead to build large and popular websites which either dominates its competitive niche or become one of the top tier sites within the industry.

Here are some additional reasons why I think working devotedly on building one flagship site instead of many will be beneficial in the long run:

  • Centralized attention. All your energy is directed towards building an incredible website that is popular and profitable. No longer will you have to divert your ideas and energy towards dozens of other smaller sites. Focus will lead to greater attention to detail and more aggressive marketing efforts.

  • Leverage for Future Success. Big sites have audiences you can carry over to your other ventures. This leverage will make your future projects a success from the site. A popular website can eventually branch out into sub niches or other related fields. Never forget that people are your most valuable assets.

  • Domain Trust. I like putting all my link building and marketing efforts within one website because domain trust is a big factor when it comes to ranking well on search engines like Google. Instead of putting several multiple sites on sub-niche topics, I’ll rather run them as sub-domains or separate pages on one main domain because they are likely to attract an equal amount or even more search traffic at a faster rate.

  • Better Monetization Potential. The money you can make from affiliate programs is much higher when you have a large audience that trusts your recommendations. Correspondingly, a well designed and popular website will always do better on direct ad sales, which can be lucrative. A strong website will also have the ability to compete with more established websites in the search engines as well.

Creating a popular site in a competitive niche like entertainment or technology is very challenging and great success can be difficult to achieve. But it’s not impossible. If you put all efforts into learning about your competitors and the industry, you can grow your website pretty quickly.

Be prepared to be very pro-active and dedicated to your website if you want it to become wildly and consistently profitable as well. Even if your site doesn’t dominate its niche, it’s likely to retain a decent share of the industry audience, which will be beneficial for your future projects.

Build a big site and focus less on the small ones. You won’t regret it.

For more effective money making tips, do subscribe to Dosh Dosh’s blog feed.

40 Comments - Share Your Thoughts
  • 100 blogs. I wish I could run that many. At one point I Was running 3 and it was a crazy hike.

  • This has got to be one of the best comparisons of the two methodologies I have ever read.

    Building a network of mini-sites would be insanely resource intensive, and I can’t imagine too many people that would want to go this route. That said, it could certainly be a worthwhile experiment for students during the summer who may have some extra time. This would allow them to find a perfect niche for their own personal flagship, as well as provide several testbeds to see what marketing methods can yield the best results.

  • Has anyone ever run over 6 blogs at a timem which actually make money? I’m just curious. I would prefer to focus on one blog.

  • very interesting reading. the “mini-site” strategy to me is like mass-producing sites/blogs. creating and maintaining them would require a lot of time and resources with the return uncertain. i prefer focusing on one or two blogs, and creating others if and when i have enough lasting material to create others. it has to be lasting because chances are i wouldn’t be able to update those other blogs regularly.

  • Absolutely agree. I’ve participated in online courses that advocates creating multiple medium sized websites with 100-200 articles that largely depended on Search Engine Traffic. They aim to monetize mainly using affilate programs and adsense. But with the ever changing SE algorithms, it makes one wonder about the long term sustainability of such models. Personally I prefer to create 1 large and valuable site.

  • I’ve got only one site so far (it’s growing ok, nothing to write home about, but it’s fine at this moment). But I plan to launch a couple more sites, that touch different themes than the main one.

    My opinion at this moment is that I want to separate each site according to the kind of information the reader expects from them. Some of my demographics will be the same, but I suppose not everyone will be interested in the 3 topics, so to make a huge mega-site might alienate some of the readers that are only interested in one part.

    So I guess one has to take an equilibrium here. For me, I think 3-4 sites is ok to cover all the range I want. More than that, would be chaos. Less than that, maybe would be cramming too much different things in one place.

    Thanks for a great article.

  • Good article. I have over 7 websites, although I find myself concentrating on mainly 3. I do enjoy the diversity though.

  • I tried to run about 10 blogs at a time , it was to hard and it took too much time, now i have only three.

  • I prefer to work in a couple of sites. I agree with you.. many “mini-site” required a lot of resources and time.

  • I would like to know anyone that has 100 of anything and can control it. I want to shake their hand.

  • Actually I ran a few blog sites, its hard to maintain. And now to create few more mini sites I created a group blog project. its compose of 7 persons maintaining few mini niched sites, so far its ok.

  • Any way I could find out what your other sites are? And how do you find the time to run several websites plus university courses? Working full time with a family makes building my online empire challenging and sure would love some tips.

  • If I had nothing to do all day then this might be an option, but it’s just not viable.

  • Great post Maki. I’ve pretty much let all my (dollar a day) websites and blogs go.

    I’ve been focusing on larger, niche specific websites of late. Your post has some good food for thought.

    Don

  • Maki,
    I couldn’t agree more with this post. I have just shut down two mini blogs I was running to pay more attention to my new, hope to be a flagship, blog on bookselling. Still have a few small sites but that’s more for fun.

  • Do you mean 100 blogs which is updated daily?
    Common, I’m not a machine.

  • Having a huge number of sites can offer a diversified income stream, but I would imagine they would take far more time to administer compared to one or two ‘flagship’ sites.

    I’ll stick with a few large sites rather than a hundred small ones any day!

    - Martin Reed

  • Personally I find that running one website/business takes enough of my time. Until I have reached my goals with one I’d rather not spread myself thin.

  • I’m just beginning the flagship approach and it is working out well so far. I have my main blog at where i discuss the projects I am pursuing in an attempt to make money online. Some of these projects include other websites. I agree that this is the way to go!

  • curtis, running multiple sites are hard to maintain thats why i have a co-blogger on some of my niched sites. I do believe 2 heads is better than 1, we do advanced posting. I also pay some student to post on my niched blogs, I cant maintain it all by myself, blogging is not my fulltime job its my hobby.

  • Not to mention the immense satisfaction I can imagine having a ‘flagship’ site would yield. This is the option I’m taking at the moment – I run two blogs but one is just for fun. I’m pouring all my serious efforts into Skelliewag.

  • I believe, prior to finding your flagship site it is best to operate a few minisites(a two step approach). The online environment is very competitive. It is exceptionally hard to achieve a flagship site, most people who do, find it accidentally. Long story short until one knows what they are doing, i think the minisite approach may facilitate the flagship approach.

  • I tihnk its better to create mini site or niche focus site than blogging anything under the sun in 1 blog

  • To Skiper –

    You have a point. Many people do quite well creating very tight niche site.

    Not so sure I buy the idea you have to be passionate about the niche either.

    Sorta defeats the purpose of finding unexploited niches.

  • I find one or two blogs enough work myself… if your readers enjoy what you write about, don’t be afraid to write a little of topic once in a while. They will follow where you are coming from, but don’t over do it. Stay to your niche and core readers, in the long run- I think that’s were the growth and money comes from.

  • Doshy, I guess niche sites have more potential. Mini sites are useful only if one is selling a product.

  • Phi Nguyen on July 30th, 2007

    From my personal experience, I’ve found mini-sites with sharp focus do best for me. I noticed Google PPC on the rise after I divided my website into niche sites. Something tells me google ads pay more per click when your site is sharply focused.

  • Isn’t having only 1 site putting all your eggs in one basket? I think having about 3 is reasonable though they may not all be the same size. I know in a google dominated world nothing stops them all from taking a dive at the same time but it would be less likely.

  • I have several small niches. Basically, I build niches that interest me. For example, I have a website completely focused on engagement rings because I am getting married!
    When it’s over, I will build the site and sell it to someone else after having built it up. That’s where the money comes from having the small niche sites.
    So I have made $1000 in affiliate/adsense with the site and can sell the site for $1000 which is not a bad investment on a $9 domain name and $5 per month hosting.

  • I also think this is the first time I saw a post comparing the two approaches to building a web ‘empire’. I own 50 domains and have some 16 sites live. Of course, the rest of the domains aren’t live yet because (like you said) there is not enough time in the day.

    At one time, I was making over $100/day in adsense for about 6 weeks on just two sites. Then, while those were making money I let them ride a bit and concentrated on setting up other new sites. Those two sites crashed and burned on google penalties, which have since expired, but they have never recovered. If I had concentrated on just 2 or 3 sites instead of a dozen that might not have happenned.

    My problem is I’m setting up sites still, to find out which ones I want to be my flagship 2 or 3, so I can sell the rest off….

    I’m blogging all of my mistakes and how I crashed and burned at my first attempt at a ‘web empire’ here

  • Hi, nice post and nice blog! I’ll come back!

  • Good points here. I think even with 100 mini blogs, you could create some that are very simple and even forget about the. They’d be a risk but you could make money should they be discovered.

Links to this Article
© 2007 - 2010 | Dosh Dosh | Content Copyright | Comment Policy | Privacy Policy

Fatal error: Call to undefined function akst_share_form() in /nfs/c01/h15/mnt/36436/domains/doshdosh.com/html/wp-content/themes/DoshDosh4/footer.php on line 10